This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was there a supply of staff to the Appellant or were they actually employees?

By Andrew Needham, November 2020

This was an appeal against HMRC’s refusal to repay VAT amounting to £40,995.38 for the 04/17 VAT period and an assessment of £69,533.70 due for the 04/17 VAT period. 

The question for the Tribunal in this appeal was whether supplies of workers which the Appellant said were made to it by three companies involved in the refurbishment of office buildings were supplies received in respect of which it could reclaim input tax. 

The Appellant argued that those three companies, the “Intermediate Companies”, were set up as its contractors acting as “gang masters” to manage sub-contractors involved in the refurbishment of office buildings and made supplies of workers to the Appellant. 

HMRC argued that the Intermediate Companies did not make supplies to the Appellant. In fact supplies were made by the sub-contractor workers themselves, who were paid directly by the Appellant and who, as

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Were cooked marshmallows normally eaten with the fingers or from a stick or skewer?
By Andrew Needham, May 2026
Was the appellant entitled to claim input tax on the basis that it intended to make taxable supplies?
By Andrew Needham, December 2022
Was the adaptation of Merlin helicopters to use early warning radar a supply of goods or services?
By Andrew Needham, February 2022
Was the appellant entitled to repayment supplement on sums subject to an offset agreement?
By Andrew Needham, November 2021
Did the appellant have a reasonable excuse for issuing a zero-rating certificate in error?
By Andrew Needham, April 2021