This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the adaptation of Merlin helicopters to use early warning radar a supply of goods or services?

By Andrew Needham, February 2022

Summary

The appellant appealed against HMRC’s decision that supplies made by it to the Ministry of Defence (MoD) were standard rated. The issue for determination was whether the supply by the appellant to the MoD of the ‘Crowsnest project’ falls within the scope of item 2, Group 8, Schedule 8 to the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VAT Act) which provides for the zero-rating of:

“The supply, repair or maintenance of a qualifying aircraft or the modification or conversion of any such aircraft provided that when so modified or converted it will remain a qualifying aircraft.”

Background

The objective of the Crowsnest project was to provide the Royal Navy with a successor air search radar capability fitted to Merlin Mk 2 helicopters. There was no disagreement between the parties that the aircraft was and remained a qualifying aircraft.

The appellant proposed a

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Were the supplies of education supplied by the three higher educational bodies exempt from VAT?
By Andrew Needham, June 2025
Was there still an appealable matter after the withdrawal of assessments?
By Andrew Needham, February 2025
Were Maga Marshmallows zero-rated food or standard-rated confectionary?
By Andrew Needham, June 2024
Was the appellant required to register and account for VAT in the UK on mail order sales to UK customers?
By Andrew Needham, February 2021
Was The Supply Of Temporary Classrooms An Exempt Supply Of Land Or A Standard Rated Supply Of Movable Property?
By Andrew Needham, November 2018