This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the appellant entitled to claim input tax on the basis that it intended to make taxable supplies?

By Andrew Needham, December 2022

Summary 

HMRC issued assessments for input VAT claimed by the appellant on the basis that during those periods, the appellant did not carry on a business or economic activity, nor was there any direct and immediate link between the inputs and outputs during those periods. The appellant’s position was that throughout those periods it was carrying on economic activity and that there was the necessary direct and immediate link. 

Background 

In their written and oral submissions at the hearing, HMRC cited Article 9 of the Principal VAT Directive and the Court of Appeal decision in Wakefield College v HMRC [2018] EWCA Civ 952 as authority for the proposition that supplies must be made  to obtain income therefrom on a continuing basis in order for there to be an economic activity, and the Tribunal should consider whether a supply for consideration had been made ("a supply for consideration is

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was the supply of treatment for female baldness a zero-rated supply of medical services for the treatment of a disability?
By Andrew Needham, March 2026
Supply chain fraud
By Andrew Needham, February 2026
Did the appellants make or intend to make taxable supplies?
By Andrew Needham, December 2023
Was the adaptation of Merlin helicopters to use early warning radar a supply of goods or services?
By Andrew Needham, February 2022
Was the provision of a medical course by a university based in Granada, some of which was delivered in the UK, subject to UK VAT?
By Andrew Needham, March 2021