This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the sale of rotisserie chickens a zero-rated supply of food of a kind for human consumption or a standard-rated supply of hot takeaway food?

By Andrew Needham, February 2026

The appellant operated a well-known supermarket chain and appealed against a number of assessments as a result of HMRC's decision that the sale of whole cool-down rotisserie chickens was liable to VAT at the standard rate.  The total amount of VAT in issue was £17,034,932. 

The appellant, Morrisons, appealed on two grounds: (1) The supply was zero-rated  pursuant to VATA 1994, Sch 8, Gp 1, item 1 and s 30, as ‘food of a kind used for human consumption’ and was not excluded from zero-rating as a ‘supply in the course of catering’.(2) In the alternative, if the Tribunal did not agree with it on the liability ground, Morrisons argued that HMRC gave clear and unambiguous rulings in 2012-2014 that the chickens were zero-rated.  

 

HMRC argued that following changes in the,

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Should the appellant have known that some of its transactions were connected with fraud and should it have been able to recover the input tax charged?
By Andrew Needham, June 2026
Was there still an appealable matter after the withdrawal of assessments?
By Andrew Needham, February 2025
Was interest payable by HMRC on overpaid output tax paid on demonstrator bonuses?
By Andrew Needham, February 2023
Was the input tax on legal fees incurred for the purposes of the business?
By Andrew Needham, September 2020
Were Sales Made In France Or Diverted To The UK And Subject To UK VAT?
By Andrew Needham, January 2019