This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the sale of rotisserie chickens a zero-rated supply of food of a kind for human consumption or a standard-rated supply of hot takeaway food?

By Andrew Needham, February 2026

The appellant operated a well-known supermarket chain and appealed against a number of assessments as a result of HMRC's decision that the sale of whole cool-down rotisserie chickens was liable to VAT at the standard rate.  The total amount of VAT in issue was £17,034,932. 

The appellant, Morrisons, appealed on two grounds: (1) The supply was zero-rated  pursuant to VATA 1994, Sch 8, Gp 1, item 1 and s 30, as ‘food of a kind used for human consumption’ and was not excluded from zero-rating as a ‘supply in the course of catering’.(2) In the alternative, if the Tribunal did not agree with it on the liability ground, Morrisons argued that HMRC gave clear and unambiguous rulings in 2012-2014 that the chickens were zero-rated.  

 

HMRC argued that following changes in the,

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was there still an appealable matter after the withdrawal of assessments?
By Andrew Needham, February 2025
Was the supply of fuel with plant hire a single composite supply or a multiple supply?
By Andrew Needham, January 2025
Was the provision of a speedy payment discount by the appellant covered by VATA 1994, Sch 6, para 4 relating to prompt payment discounts?
By Andrew Needham, November 2024
Did the appellant know or should they have known that the transaction was connected to fraud?
By Andrew Needham, June 2023
When was interest due from upon a claim for bad debt relief?
By Andrew Needham, November 2021