This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the provision of a speedy payment discount by the appellant covered by VATA 1994, Sch 6, para 4 relating to prompt payment discounts?

By Andrew Needham, November 2024

Summary 

The appellant supplied fixed and mobile telephones, pay TV and broadband internet access services to retail and commercial customers. This appeal is only concerned with supplies to retail customers. Between 1 January and 30 April 2014, the appellant offered most of its retail customers a 15% discount on certain services if they paid their bills within 24 hours of receiving them. This was called the speedy payment discount (SPD). The appellant considered that the prompt payment discount, then in force, applied to all these supplies even though only 3% of customers took advantage and accounted for VAT on the discounted amount. HMRC took the view that the prompt payment discount did not apply and assessed the appellant for in excess of £10m. 

Background 

The appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) which dismissed its appeal, and the appellant obtained permission to appeal to the

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Were hair transplants a medical procedure or a cosmetic process?
By Andrew Needham, April 2025
Did the appellant have a reasonable excuse for submitting the appeal late?
By Andrew Needham, January 2025
Was the provision of outsourced loan administration exempt from VAT?
By Andrew Needham, December 2024
Were the services provided within the medical exemption and was the assessment issued within time?
By Andrew Needham, August 2024
Was the appellant entitled to adjust its DGT figure more than 4 years after the debt became due?
By Andrew Needham, March 2020