This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Expenditure on warehouse conversion to a car showroom attracted business property renovation allowances

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2025

Works done to a warehouse which resulted in a Toyota car showroom amounted to a conversion for business property allowances purposes as there was continuity of identity of the warehouse notwithstanding substantial alterations, and allowances were due.  

The appellant company specialised in the sale of motor vehicles. On 9 December 2015, the appellant’s parent company purchased a warehouse, which was disused at that time. The purchase price of the warehouse was £978,000 (including VAT). The vendor was Tesco Stores Limited. Until October 2008, the warehouse had been used as an MFI furniture store. The warehouse was immediately leased to the appellant for 99 years with a view to it engaging a contractor to build the car showroom at the site. The appellant contracted with a firm to carry out works at the warehouse for the sum of £1.4m. The car showroom opened on 24 September 2016. The total sum of money incurred on the project was &pound,

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Appeal struck out as company that adopted cash basis of accounting had no reasonable prospect of success
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2023
Judicial review application following HMRC’s notification of intention to publish information on tax avoidance scheme refused
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2023
Group debt restructuring involved a tax advantage and a tax avoidance purpose
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023
Information notices. Burden of proof that information and documents are reasonably required can shift from HMRC to the taxpayer
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2022
Satellite launch costs were not eligible for capital allowances
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021