This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Expenditure on yard was revenue and not capital in nature

By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020

Expenditure on a yard used by vehicles was a repair of the yard and not a replacement of the yard, and so was a revenue expense. 

Summary 

Expenditure on a yard used by vehicles was a repair of the yard and not a replacement of the yard, and so was a revenue expense of the company’s business. 

Background 

A site, which included a factory and yard, was acquired in 2004 by a married couple and leased to the appellant company. The factory and the yard together formed the entirety of the relevant asset. Before and after the relevant expenditure, the whole of the yard was used to unload articulated lorries, to move those lorries, and to provide trailer storage. The cost of the works was approximately £74,000. The cost to replace the entire site would be approximately £6,500,000. 

Prior to the expenditure,

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Professional fees incurred in company sale were capital in nature
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2024
Appeal struck out as company that adopted cash basis of accounting had no reasonable prospect of success
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2023
Business and goodwill were not transferred on a later date contended by HMRC
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2023
Computer and clerical error were not reasonable excuses for the late filing of a corporation tax return
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2022
Taxpayer was not the transferor for transfer of assets abroad purposes 2021
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2021