This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Insufficient proof that qualifying research and development was undertaken

By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020

The appellant company failed to prove that it undertook qualifying research and development, and even if the company had undertaken such work it failed to prove that the costs included in its claim related to research and development activities.   

The appellant company’s business was the provision to third parties of human resource services and systems, including relating to the recruitment of new employees. In its corporation tax returns to 31 December 2014 and 31 December 2015, the appellant claimed research and development (R&D) relief (pursuant to CTA 2009, s 1044) and, on the basis of that relief, R&D tax credits (pursuant to CTA 2009, s 1055). 

The appellant provided HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) with a document titled ‘R&D Activity Summary’. In

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Charitable company’s payments were loan repayments and not non-charitable expenditure
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2026
Director’s loan account was not written off when HMRC claimed it had been
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2024
Arrangements were potentially part of a scheme caught by consortium relief anti-avoidance
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2021
Taxpayer was not the transferor for transfer of assets abroad purposes 2021
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2021
Injury of company’s sole director was not a reasonable excuse to admit a late appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2021