This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Expenditure was not an allowable deduction and not qualifying R&D expenditure

By Arthur Weller, December 2024

The appellant company was carrying on a trade, but expenditure was not allowable as a deduction in calculating the profits of the appellant company’s trade and was not qualifying expenditure on contracted-out research and development. 

During the period 1 June 2016 to 31 May 2017, the appellant company: (1) received income (turnover) of about £30,000; and (2) incurred administrative expenses of just over £2m. The appellant’s tax return showed a trading loss for the period of £2,050,958. This was: (1) the loss for the year as shown in the appellant’s audited accounts, augmented by: (2) an additional research and development (R&D) relief deduction claimed under CTA 2009, s 1044 of £1,772,955 (derived by multiplying £1,325,350 by 130%). The figure of £1,325,350 was itself derived by applying 65% (per CTA 2009, s 1136, the ‘qualifying element’ of what the appellant company considered to be-

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Company was entitled to deductions for expenditure in connection with accountancy practice clients
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026
Goodwill amortisation on company’s acquisition of care homes was overstated
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2025
Information notice was valid, but its scope was far too wide
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2024
Compensation settlement receipt was revenue in nature
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2021
The expenditure on various structures of a hydroelectric power generation scheme was allowable
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2021