This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Facility For Drying, Conditioning, And Storing Grain Was Plant And Machinery

By Mark McLaughlin, April 2019

A facility for the purposes of drying, conditioning, and storing grain constituted a ‘silo provided for temporary storage’ and expenditure on its construction qualified as plant and machinery for capital allowances purposes. 
 
In 2010, the appellant set up a new business, a large part of which involved grain production for sale to local farms and feed mills. The appellant required a facility for drying and conditioning the grain that he grew after it had been harvested, and for storing the grain until it was sold. He had this facility constructed. 
 
In his self-assessment returns for the tax years 2011/12 to 2013/14, the appellant claimed plant and machinery allowances in respect of the expenditure incurred on the construction of the facility.  
 
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) subsequently opened enquiries into the appellant’s returns. HMRC concluded that although

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Legal expenses were wholly and exclusively for the purposes of a partnership’s trade
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2022
Claims for expenditure on subsistence and training disallowed due to lack of evidence
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2020
No Income Tax Relief For Son’s Loans To Father’s Company Claimed As Irrecoverable
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2018
GP Continued Providing Locum Services Through Agency And Not His Company
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2018
Accommodation Costs Were Not Wholly And Exclusively Incurred By Actor
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2015