This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

First-tier Tribunal erred in law by making a direction that a hearing be held in private

By Mark McLaughlin, March 2025

The First-tier Tribunal made material errors of law in its decision in relation to a direction that a preliminary hearing be held in private, and the upper tribunal remade the First-tier Tribunal’s decision to set aside that direction. 

The taxpayer (LD) appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) against certain decisions which HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) had made denying him deductions for income tax purposes. The deductions which had been claimed were said to arise in relation to arrangements which had been challenged by HMRC, and which were the subject of two other lead cases (‘lead appeals’). On 23 December 2019, LD applied to the FTT for a direction that his appeal be stayed behind the lead appeals (the ‘stay application’). HMRC opposed the application. On 13 July 2021, LD made an application to the FTT for various directions and orders (the ‘privacy and anonymity application’). 

Both the stay

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

HMRC was not required to notify liability to a charge
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2025
TV presenter’s services provided through personal service company were within IR35
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2023
Replacement discovery assessments did not displace previous assessments
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2021
Project manager working through personal service company was caught by IR35 rules
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2021
Share options were acquired at the date of grant and not when the shares vested
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2020