This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Grounds of property were not mixed use by reason of a public right of way

By Mark McLaughlin, December 2022

The grounds of a property were not mixed use by reason of a public right of way, which did not constitute a commercial operation and did not stop it from being residential property. 

On 28 August 2020, the appellants jointly purchased a property for £2,999,000. On 4 September 2020, the appellants filed a stamp duty land tax (SDLT) return declaring that they were due to pay SDLT of £258,630 based on the property being classed as residential. On 18 December 2020, the appellants’ agent wrote to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) stating that having analysed the tax return data they were of the view that the property was misclassified as being residential and should have been classed as ‘mixed use’. As a result, they wished to amend the SDLT return in respect of the transaction. The appellants amended the return and sought repayment of £119,180 with interest. The basis for the application for repayment was:  

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Property was ‘suitable for use as a dwelling’ so as to constitute ‘residential property’
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2025
Property was wholly residential as a part used commercially was suitable for use as a dwelling
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2025
Higher-rate LTT due on property purchase but penalty was excessive
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023
Market value applied where an annuity was consideration for a land transaction
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
It was not ‘reasonable in all the circumstances’ not to take corrective action
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021