This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Grounds of property were not mixed use by reason of a public right of way

By Mark McLaughlin, December 2022

The grounds of a property were not mixed use by reason of a public right of way, which did not constitute a commercial operation and did not stop it from being residential property. 

On 28 August 2020, the appellants jointly purchased a property for £2,999,000. On 4 September 2020, the appellants filed a stamp duty land tax (SDLT) return declaring that they were due to pay SDLT of £258,630 based on the property being classed as residential. On 18 December 2020, the appellants’ agent wrote to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) stating that having analysed the tax return data they were of the view that the property was misclassified as being residential and should have been classed as ‘mixed use’. As a result, they wished to amend the SDLT return in respect of the transaction. The appellants amended the return and sought repayment of £119,180 with interest. The basis for the application for repayment was:  

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Property under construction was a residential property and therefore subject to higher residential SDLT rates
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
Tax: Refund of higher rate LTT was not due as claim was made after the deadline
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2025
Individual liable to SDLT despite relief being available as no claim was made
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2025
HMRC’s SDLT discovery assessment was validly made
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2022
Multiple dwellings relief: Property and basement annex did not each count as a dwelling
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2020