This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

HMRC could not refresh time limit for penalty by reissuing information requirements

By Mark McLaughlin, December 2020

On 24 July 2017, HMRC wrote to the appellant, stating they had received information that the appellant had “purchased and disposed of a number of properties going back over a number of years” and failed to declare them. No response was received. On 11 October 2017, HMRC issued the appellant with a notice (under FA 2008, Sch 36) (Notice 1) requiring him to produce various information and documents by 20 November 2017. 

On 30 July 2018, HMRC sent a second information notice (Notice 2) to the appellant, which comprised requests for information made by HMRC in a letter dated 21 May 2018. On 23 January 2019, HMRC sent the appellant another information notice (Notice 3). This combined the text of the two previous notices, word for word. On 19 March 2019, HMRC issued the appellant with a £300 penalty for failure to comply with Notice 3. The appellant appealed. 

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) noted that a penalty could only be

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

What if HMRC delays the repayment of VAT?
By Andrew Needham, January 2023
Information letter about HICBC received before child’s birth was not a reasonable excuse for failing to notify the charge
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2021
Presumption of continuity applied in determining taxable profits
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2020
Taxpayers’ behaviour was not fraudulent/deliberate but was negligent/careless
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2020
Information notices restricted to documents and information from previous six years
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020