This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Presumption of continuity applied in determining taxable profits

By Mark McLaughlin, December 2020

The appellant company was a jeweller and bullion dealer. It appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) against discovery assessments and closure notices made by HMRC for its accounting periods ended 31 January 2007 to 31 January 2014 inclusive. 

Between 2007 and 2012, the price of gold rose substantially. This resulted in a transformation in the company’s business. In its 2006 accounting period, turnover was around £3 million and it focused on selling jewellery to the public and shops. However, by the 2011 accounting period it had a turnover of over £140 million and its business consisted almost entirely of purchasing scrap gold for smelting. HMRC did not consider the company had provided sufficient evidence of expenditure that the company claimed to have incurred on the purchase of the gold.  

The FTT held (among other things): (1) For the 2011 accounting period, some expenditure had to be added back to

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

What if HMRC delays the repayment of VAT?
By Andrew Needham, January 2023
Legal and insurance costs in settlement agreement were employment income
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2021
Information letter about HICBC received before child’s birth was not a reasonable excuse for failing to notify the charge
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2021
HMRC could not refresh time limit for penalty by reissuing information requirements
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2020
Information notices restricted to documents and information from previous six years
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020