This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

HMRC was entitled to claw back scheme payments

By Mark McLaughlin, September 2025

A company’s payments to employees under the coronavirus job retention scheme were not ‘qualifying costs’ under the relevant scheme legislation, and an appeal against assessments to claw back payments was dismissed.     

Prior to the coronavirus pandemic, the appellant company employed up to 50 full-time staff plus part-time students. Under the coronavirus job retention scheme (CJRS), the appellant had claimed and received CJRS support payments or grants in relation to three employees (Anthony, Amy, and Amelia). Employers could only claim grant payments for furloughed employees for whom HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) had received PAYE Real Time Information (RTI) communications in the form of a full payment submission (FPS) by specific dates.  

For CJRS grants covering periods up to 31 October 2020, the RTI FPS had to be received by 19 March 2020, disclosing the employees’ 2019/20 pay from the

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Expenditure on preparatory work was ineligible for capital allowances
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2026
Partnership business acquired by company was carried on before 1 April 2002
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026
Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider applications that documents were privileged communications
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2025
Public law issues were not relevant to appeal against CIS determination
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2024
SSE unavailable as shares sold were owned by a company in a group for less than 12 months
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2023