This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

HMRC’s interpretation of ‘tunnel’ and ‘aqueduct’ rejected

By Mark McLaughlin, July 2023

The respondent company was entitled to claim capital allowances for expenditure incurred in the construction of a hydroelectric power scheme and some elements of the scheme were not properly described as tunnels or aqueducts so were not excluded from capital allowances. 

The respondent company (SSE) claimed capital allowances on expenditure incurred when constructing the Glendoe Hydro Electric Power Scheme. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) disputed £227 million of SSE's claimed capital allowances for tax years 31 March 2006 to 31 March 2012, on the basis that certain assets did not give rise to allowable expenditure under CAA 2001. SSE appealed.  

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) held that SSE was entitled to claim allowances for some of the disputed items but upheld HMRC's view on others. HMRC appealed to the Upper Tribunal, who dismissed the appeal and allowed SSE's challenge to parts of the FTT's decision.,

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Intra-group loan had an unallowable purpose
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2024
Intra-group loan had an unallowable purpose
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2023
Computer and clerical error were not reasonable excuses for the late filing of a corporation tax return
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2022
Preliminary ruling to be requested from CJEU on questions relating to UK tax legislation on intra-group disposals
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2021
Insufficient proof that qualifying research and development was undertaken
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020