This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

HMRC’s refusal to suspend penalty for a careless tax return error was not flawed

By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026

The Upper Tribunal found no material error of law in the First-tier Tribunal’s decision that HMRC’s refusal to suspend penalties imposed on the taxpayers for a careless tax return error was not flawed. 

Summary 

The Upper Tribunal (UT) found no material error of law in the First-tier Tribunal’s (FTT’s) decision that the refusal by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to suspend penalties imposed on the taxpayers for a careless tax return error was not flawed. 

Background 

The appellants were shareholders in a company (DWIFA) who decided in 2018 to dispose of their shareholdings in DWIFA to other shareholders. The parties were aware of the 5% shareholding which was required to claim entrepreneurs’ relief (ER) (now business asset

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Company payment to employee benefit trust and subsequent loan did not constitute earnings of director and shareholder
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2026
Sums received on a capital reduction were transactions in securities
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
Arrangements for issue of shares were disqualifying so authority to issue SEIS compliance certificates refused
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2024
Subsistence expenses paid to employees were within the scope of a dispensation
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2023
LLPs were trading and were carrying on a trade with a view to profit
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021