This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

HMRC’s refusal to suspend penalty for a careless tax return error was not flawed

By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026

The Upper Tribunal found no material error of law in the First-tier Tribunal’s decision that HMRC’s refusal to suspend penalties imposed on the taxpayers for a careless tax return error was not flawed. 

Summary 

The Upper Tribunal (UT) found no material error of law in the First-tier Tribunal’s (FTT’s) decision that the refusal by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to suspend penalties imposed on the taxpayers for a careless tax return error was not flawed. 

Background 

The appellants were shareholders in a company (DWIFA) who decided in 2018 to dispose of their shareholdings in DWIFA to other shareholders. The parties were aware of the 5% shareholding which was required to claim entrepreneurs’ relief (ER) (now business asset

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Dividends of a capital nature from a non-UK resident company were liable to income tax
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
Reasonable excuse was no defence against discovery assessments
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2025
Qualified accountant’s tax return error was ‘careless’ but not ‘deliberate’ for penalty purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021
Illness and death of agent’s father was reasonable excuse for taxpayers’ late returns
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2020
No trading deduction allowed for interest paid by partners rather than by the partnership
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020