This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

No entitlement to treaty relief but unilateral credit was available

By Mark McLaughlin, August 2021

A unilateral credit was available for interest paid by a US subsidiary to a UK parent company where the interest was subject to deduction of US withholding tax, but no entitlement arose to benefit under the double tax treaty between the UK and US. 

The appellant company (AUK) was the wholly-owned subsidiary of a Japanese parent company. AUK established a wholly-owned subsidiary (AUS), which was resident in the US for tax purposes. During its accounting periods ended 31 March 2007 to 31 March 2009, AUK made loans to AUS and received interest payments. The US imposed withholding tax (at 30%) on the interest received. AUK was liable to corporation tax on the interest received from AUS. 

On 18 April 2008, AUK applied to the US revenue authorities (IRS) for access to benefits of the double tax convention between

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Expenditure was not an allowable deduction and not qualifying R&D expenditure
By Arthur Weller, December 2024
Public law issues were not relevant to appeal against CIS determination
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2024
Delays in obtaining trust deed from trustees was not a reasonable excuse
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Expenditure on yard was revenue and not capital in nature
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020
Senior accounting officers: Penalties on dormant company and SAO were upheld
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2020