This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

No Relief On Property Disposal As It Was Not The Taxpayer’s Residence

By Mark McLaughlin, January 2019

The taxpayer was not entitled to private residence relief on the disposal of a property because she did not occupy it with the intention that it would be her permanent home.

Background

The appellant owned a house in London from 14 July 2006 to 12 July 2007, although she did not gain entry to the house until 28 August 2006 (because the property was initially occupied by a tenant), and she decided to sell it by 28 March 2007 following a failed planning permission application.

The purchase price of the house (£190,000) was financed by borrowings from her mother in the first instance, and with bank borrowings of £125,000 as a one-year loan.

The appellant was a student. In mid-September 2006, she accepted the offer of a room in a student hall of residence in Southampton. Thereafter, the appellant began using her halls of residence address as her postal address. She stayed at the house in London (which was initially in

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Property sold to co-habitant was part of a dwelling house that was an only or main residence
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2021
Property was only or main residence for entire ‘period of ownership’
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2020
Property Was A ‘Residence’ Despite Short Period Of Occupation
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2017
Private Residence Relief And Lettings Relief Available On Disposal Of Individual’s Residence Of 52 Days
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2016
Taxpayers’ Apportionment Of Proceeds Between House And Land Was Correct
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2014