This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Property was only or main residence for entire ‘period of ownership’

By Mark McLaughlin, January 2020

The appellant’s period of ownership of an apartment for capital gains tax (CGT) private residence relief purposes began when he owned the legal and equitable interest in the lease of the apartment and the legal right to occupy it, being the date of legal completion of the purchase of the lease. His period of ownership ended when the contract for its sale was completed. 

Background 

On 2 October 2006, the taxpayer entered into a contract to lease an apartment. The apartment did not exist in 2006; the area which was to become the apartment was a space in a tower. 

The work on the area that became the apartment began in November 2009. The apartment was substantially physically completed in December 2009. The purchase was legally completed on 5 January 2010. The taxpayer had no right to occupy the dwelling until

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Period of ownership commenced when a new dwelling was built
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2022
Taxpayer was not trading in properties but was not entitled to private residence relief
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2022
Taxpayer entitled to relief in respect of a ten-week period of residence
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2019
Taxpayer’s Stay At Property Was Insufficient To Make It A ‘Residence’
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2019
Properties Were Not ‘Residences’ For Relief Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2014