This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Properties Were Not ‘Residences’ For Relief Purposes

By Mark McLaughlin, December 2014
The taxpayer failed to satisfy the tribunal on a balance of probabilities that she had occupied properties as her only or main residence during her period of ownership, for the purposes of claiming principal private residence relief upon their sale.

The appellant purchased a flat as her residence in June 2003. She subsequently purchased a house in March 2004, and sold it in February 2005. The appellant purchased another house in May 2005, and sold it in November 2006. 

The appellant claimed principle private residence (PPR) relief (under TCGA 1992, ss 222, 223) in respect of the house sales in her tax returns for 2004/05 and 2006/07. Following enquiries by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), closure notices were issued charging gains on both property sales to capital gains tax, on the basis that no PPR relief was due. The appellant appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) considered that the weight of
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Taxpayer was not trading in properties but was not entitled to private residence relief
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2022
Property sold to co-habitant was part of a dwelling house that was an only or main residence
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2021
Taxpayer’s stay at two residences was only temporary
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2019
Taxpayer entitled to relief in respect of a ten-week period of residence
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2019
No Relief On Property Disposal As It Was Not The Taxpayer’s Residence
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2019