This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider HMRC’s refusal to apply a concession

By Mark McLaughlin, January 2020

The First-tier Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider the application of extra-statutory concession D49 following HMRC’s refusal to apply it and allow the appellants’ period of absence to be treated as a period of occupation for private residence relief purposes.  

The appellants (a married couple) purchased four interests in land between 11 June 2001 and 17 April 2002, which they converted into a single dwelling. The appellants took up residence in the property at some time between September 2003 and November 2003. 

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) considered that the date of acquisition of a property, which was acquired in stages (as in this case), commenced from the time of entering into an unconditional contract for the first part of the property that was acquired (i.e. 11 June 2001). Commencement of occupation in September 2003 or November 2003 was

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

An old hospital building was never the taxpayer’s only or main residence
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2022
Property was not occupied as a residence
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2020
Occupation Of House Did Not Have Sufficient Quality To Qualify For Relief
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2019
Concession Extended Deemed Period Of Occupation
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2018
Properties Were Not ‘Residences’ For Relief Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2014