This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider HMRC’s refusal to apply a concession

By Mark McLaughlin, January 2020

The First-tier Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider the application of extra-statutory concession D49 following HMRC’s refusal to apply it and allow the appellants’ period of absence to be treated as a period of occupation for private residence relief purposes.  

The appellants (a married couple) purchased four interests in land between 11 June 2001 and 17 April 2002, which they converted into a single dwelling. The appellants took up residence in the property at some time between September 2003 and November 2003. 

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) considered that the date of acquisition of a property, which was acquired in stages (as in this case), commenced from the time of entering into an unconditional contract for the first part of the property that was acquired (i.e. 11 June 2001). Commencement of occupation in September 2003 or November 2003 was

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Taxpayer was not trading in properties but was not entitled to private residence relief
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2022
Concession Extended Deemed Period Of Occupation
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2018
Taxpayer’s Occupation Of Elected Properties Did Not Amount To ‘Residence’
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2016
No Relief On Disposal Of Building Plot In Grounds Of Former Residence
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2015
Taxpayers’ Apportionment Of Proceeds Between House And Land Was Correct
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2014