This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayer’s Occupation Of Elected Properties Did Not Amount To ‘Residence’

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2016
Private residence relief was not available on the taxpayer’s disposal of a number of properties elected to be main residences, as his occupation of those properties did not amount to ‘residence’.

The appellant owned and disposed of a number of properties, in respect of which he claimed private residence relief for capital gains tax (CGT) purposes (under TCGA 1992, s 222). HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) opened an enquiry into the appellant’s tax return for 2009/10.

HMRC subsequently challenged the private residence relief claims made for 2009/10, and also 2010/11. The appellant appealed. At the appeal hearing, the appellant intimated that he had withdrawn claims for private residence relief in relation to three flats. That left four flats, one of which was disposed of in 2009/10, and the remaining properties in 2010/11.

The appellant also owned a farmhouse. He informed the First-tier
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Taxpayer was not trading in properties but was not entitled to private residence relief
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2022
An old hospital building was never the taxpayer’s only or main residence
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2022
Taxpayer’s Stay At Property Was Insufficient To Make It A ‘Residence’
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2019
Flat Purchased ‘Off-Plan’ Was Not Eligible For Full Relief On Disposal
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2018
Taxpayers’ Apportionment Of Proceeds Between House And Land Was Correct
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2014