This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Property was not occupied as an only or main residence

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2020

The taxpayer’s appeal against the rejection by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) of a claim for principal private residence (PPR) relief was dismissed, as there was no evidence that the taxpayer had occupied the dwelling as her only or main residence at any time during her period of ownership.

Background

On 18 December 2001, and following her divorce, the appellant purchased a property (CC). She moved into it with her daughter (V). A few years later, the appellant’s widowed sister (BO) moved in with her. In 2010, V moved to Paris to live with her French boyfriend, and they decided to get married in late 2012. They married on 15 June 2013.

In 2011, the appellant met a wine merchant (PDD) living and working in France, and they fell in love. At some point in 2012 or early 2013, the appellant suggested to PDD that he close

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Taxpayer was not trading in properties but was not entitled to private residence relief
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2022
Taxpayer entitled to relief in respect of a ten-week period of residence
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2019
Property Was A ‘Residence’ Despite Short Period Of Occupation
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2017
Property Did Not Become The Taxpayer’s Residence
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2017
Private Residence Relief And Lettings Relief Available On Disposal Of Individual’s Residence Of 52 Days
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2016