This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Occupation Of House Did Not Have Sufficient Quality To Qualify For Relief

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2019

The appellant’s occupation of a house was such that it did not have sufficient ‘quality’ for the property to qualify as an only or main residence for private residence relief purposes. 
 
Background 
 
The appellant purchased a property in September 2007, with the intention that it would be a family home for him and his fiancée (they had lived for some time in a flat). When the appellant bought the property, it needed a significant amount of work. He also applied for planning permission to extend the property. Whilst the application was in progress, he let out the house.  
 
Planning permission was granted in March 2008. The appellant and his fiancée married in August 2008. However, the marriage was strained. In January 2011, his wife instructed divorce lawyers. In April 2011, the appellant moved into the property. It was advertised

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider HMRC’s refusal to apply a concession
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2020
Concession Extended Deemed Period Of Occupation
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2018
Property Did Not Become The Taxpayer’s Residence
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2017
Private Residence Relief And Lettings Relief Available On Disposal Of Individual’s Residence Of 52 Days
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2016
Taxpayers’ Apportionment Of Proceeds Between House And Land Was Correct
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2014