This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Paddock was not part of the grounds of a dwelling

By Mark McLaughlin, July 2023

A paddock did not form part of the grounds of a dwelling house, so non-residential rates of stamp duty land tax applied due to mixed residential and non-residential use of the property.  

Summary 

A paddock did not form part of the grounds of a dwelling house, so non-residential rates of stamp duty land tax (SDLT) applied due to mixed residential and non-residential use of the property.  

Background 

On 11 December 2020, the appellants acquired a property in Henley-on-Thames, which included a garden, tennis court and paddock. On the same date as the appellants completed the purchase of the property, they granted a grazing lease of the paddock for one year to an individual (P) at an annual rent of £1,000. The lease described the “permitted use” as “use for grazing up to 2 horses for [P’s] private purpose only.” The appellants granted&

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Property under construction was a residential property and therefore subject to higher residential SDLT rates
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
Higher rates were due as appellants failed to demonstrate the disposal of a major interest in their existing properties
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2025
Repayment claim was subject to normal time limit for amending land transaction returns
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021
Market value applied where an annuity was consideration for a land transaction
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Tribunal had no jurisdiction in appeal against late payment interest
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021