This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Higher rates were due as appellants failed to demonstrate the disposal of a major interest in their existing properties

By Mark McLaughlin, May 2025

Higher rates of SDLT applied to the acquisition of a second home as the First-tier Tribunal was not persuaded that there had been a replacement of an only or main residence. 

NB. The appeal concerned two separate property acquisitions, which were dealt with together because they concerned the same statutory rules.  

On 19 May 2017, two of the appellants (PH and TP) acquired a property (TMH) for £3,600,000. Stamp duty land tax (SDLT) was paid in respect of the conveyance, including the higher rates for additional dwellings. On 11 May 2020, a TR1 transfer form was completed by PH and TP in relation to another property (NCW), which was intended to document the severing of a previous joint tenancy of NCW into a tenancy in common, with £19,000 said to have been transferred from TP to PH in consideration of PH transferring 1% of his interest to TP. On 3 July 2020, PH and TP’s agent sought to amend PH and TP’s SDLT return and

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Partly completed development was residential property at the effective date of the transaction
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2025
Multiple dwellings relief available on two dwellings purchased as a single property
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2024
Paddock was not part of the grounds of a dwelling house
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2024
Main house and annex did not each count as a dwelling for multiple dwellings relief purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Multiple dwellings relief: Property and basement annex did not each count as a dwelling
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2020