This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Paddock was not part of the grounds of a dwelling house

By Mark McLaughlin, September 2024

The First-tier Tribunal was not in error in concluding that a paddock did not form part of the grounds of a dwelling house, such that non-residential rates of stamp duty land tax applied due to mixed residential and non-residential use of the property.  

Summary 

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) was not in error in concluding that a paddock did not form part of the grounds of a dwelling house, such that non-residential rates of stamp duty land tax (SDLT) applied due to mixed residential and non-residential use of the property. 

Background 

On 11 December 2020, a married couple (S) acquired a property in Henley-on-Thames, which included a garden, tennis court and paddock. On the same date as S completed the purchase of the property, they granted a grazing lease of the paddock for one year to an individual (‘P’) at an annual rent of £1,000. The lease described

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Property was ‘suitable for use as a dwelling’ so as to constitute ‘residential property’
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2025
Company’s acquisition of residential property was liable to higher rate of SDLT and no exclusions applied
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2025
Enquiry was opened in time and property did not replace only or main residence
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2023
The consideration for residential property did not include the grant of an annuity
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2021
Residential property: Property was not ‘mixed use’ but entirely residential
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2020