This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Residential property: Property was not ‘mixed use’ but entirely residential

By Mark McLaughlin, April 2020

An appeal against the refusal of a stamp duty land tax refund claim was dismissed as the property was used wholly for residential purposes and was not a ‘mixed use’ property as the appellants contended.

The appellants completed the purchase of a property on 21 March 2016. The property was described in the land agent’s particulars as a ‘fantastic family home set in about 4.5 acres within the sought after New Forest National Park’ with six bedrooms, gardens, swimming pool, garaging, stable yard and paddocks. The property cost £1,775,000, on which the appellants paid stamp duty land tax (SDLT) of £126,750, having entered the property as residential on their SDLT1 return.

On 30 October 2017 (i.e. nearly one and half years later), the appellants’ tax agents submitted a claim (under FA 2003, Sch 10, para 34) seeking relief on SDLT which it

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Property was ‘suitable for use as a dwelling’ so as to constitute ‘residential property’
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2025
Property under construction was a residential property and therefore subject to higher residential SDLT rates
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
Company’s acquisition of residential property was liable to higher rate of SDLT and no exclusions applied
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2025
HMRC’s SDLT discovery assessment was validly made
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2022
Contingent consideration: Part of the consideration for a land transaction was contingent
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021