This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Penalties for incorrect tax return could be suspended in part

By Mark McLaughlin, August 2021

Penalties for additional tax in respect of income carelessly omitted from the taxpayer’s self-assessment return could be suspended, but penalties in respect of tax on undisclosed bank deposits could not be suspended as the omission was deliberate.  

The appellant’s self-assessment return for the tax year 2013/14 omitted income of £4,237 relating to Sussex Building Services/Sutton Management. Furthermore, following an enquiry into the return, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) concluded that unexplained bank deposits represented undisclosed taxable income. The appellant appealed against the amendments to her tax return and penalties imposed by HMRC based on deliberate and concealed inaccuracy. 

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that the appellant’s explanations for the unexplained deposits were not credible. £15,000 had been deposited to open the appellant’s bank

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

No ‘reasonable grounds’ to justify an application to postpone tax
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023
Share options were acquired at the date of grant and not when the shares vested
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2022
The taxpayer was prevented from challenging the validity of HMRC’s tax return enquiry
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021
Qualified accountant’s tax return error was ‘careless’ but not ‘deliberate’ for penalty purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021
Construction industry scheme: Special purpose property development company payments were subject to the CIS
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2020