This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Penalties for incorrect tax return could be suspended in part

By Mark McLaughlin, August 2021

Penalties for additional tax in respect of income carelessly omitted from the taxpayer’s self-assessment return could be suspended, but penalties in respect of tax on undisclosed bank deposits could not be suspended as the omission was deliberate.  

The appellant’s self-assessment return for the tax year 2013/14 omitted income of £4,237 relating to Sussex Building Services/Sutton Management. Furthermore, following an enquiry into the return, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) concluded that unexplained bank deposits represented undisclosed taxable income. The appellant appealed against the amendments to her tax return and penalties imposed by HMRC based on deliberate and concealed inaccuracy. 

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that the appellant’s explanations for the unexplained deposits were not credible. £15,000 had been deposited to open the appellant’s bank

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Negligible value claim did not satisfy the requirements for a valid claim
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2023
Discovery provisions did not apply for the purpose of assessing the high-income child benefit charge
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023
First-tier Tribunal did not have power to review HMRC’s refusal to accept late elections for fixed protection
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2022
Legal and insurance costs in a settlement agreement were not employment income of police officer
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Reliance on professional advice was a reasonable excuse for late claim for lifetime allowance enhanced protection
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2021