This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Presumption of continuity applied in determining taxable profits

By Mark McLaughlin, November 2020

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) made errors of law and the Upper Tribunal set aside the FTT’s decision for two accounting periods, and remitted the matter back to the FTT to calculate the company’s profits including by applying the presumption of continuity for the earlier accounting period.  

The appellant company traded as a jeweller and bullion dealer. It appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) against discovery assessments and closure notices made by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for its accounting periods ended 31 January 2007 to 31 January 2014 inclusive. 

Between 2007 and 2012, the price of gold rose substantially. This resulted in a transformation in the company’s business. In its 2006 accounting period, turnover was around £3 million and it focused

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Goodwill amortisation on company’s acquisition of care homes was overstated
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2025
HMRC directed to issue tax enquiry closure notices despite a pending Supreme Court decision
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2025
Compensation settlement receipt was revenue in nature
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2021
Discovery assessment invalid as a hypothetical HMRC officer should have been aware of an insufficiency of tax
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2021
Jersey companies were centrally managed and controlled in the UK and not in Jersey
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2021