This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Property did not comprise a mixture of residential and non-residential property

By Mark McLaughlin, May 2026

The First-tier Tribunal erred in holding that land acquired was not ‘grounds’ so a property was not entirely ‘residential property’ such that HMRC’s appeal was allowed and the First-tier Tribunal’s decision was remade to dismiss the taxpayer’s SDLT assessment appeal.

On 3 July 2020, the taxpayer (CB) completed the purchase of a property comprising over six acres, which included a dwelling house in the northeastern corner of the plot nearest a road. The dwelling was a two-storey L-shaped building and a large garden. There was also an area of approximately two acres on the western boundary of the plot which was bounded by a river on the western side and by a ‘carrier stream’ on its eastern boundary. A stamp duty land tax (SDLT) return was filed on the basis that the property was residential. However, an amended SDLT return was subsequently filed on the basis that the property included residential and non

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Enquiry was opened in time and property did not replace only or main residence
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2023
Higher-rate LTT due on property purchase but penalty was excessive
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023
HMRC’s SDLT discovery assessment was validly made
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2022
Repayment claim was subject to normal time limit for amending land transaction returns
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021
Contingent consideration: Part of the consideration for a land transaction was contingent
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021