This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Property was not acquired exclusively for property rental business so did not qualify for relief from higher rate of SDLT

By Mark McLaughlin, October 2019

A property was not acquired ‘exclusively’ by the appellant company for the purpose of a qualifying property rental business, and accordingly relief from the higher rate of stamp duty land tax was not due.  
 
The appellant’s business was primarily to arrange the provision of self-employed carers to persons needing their services and to receive fees. On 15 December 2015, the appellant exchanged contracts with the seller to purchase a property for £930,000. The property had been advertised for sale as a family home. Completion occurred on 21 December 2015, which was the effective date of the purchase.   
 
The appellant received permission from Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council on 15 December 2015 to change the use of the property from a dwelling to a temporary residence for residential carers. The appellant refurbished and updated the property. Since that work was

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Two dwellings amalgamated into single residence were not each entitled to relief from SDLT higher rate
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2021
Higher Rate Charge Relief Not Available As Property Was Not A Dwelling When Made Available To The Public
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2018
Mistake In Return Was Not A Reasonable Excuse For Its Late Filing
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2016
Company’s Appeal Against Liability On Acquisition Of Former Chelsea Barracks Allowed
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2016
Retrospective Legislation Did Not Breach Human Rights
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2015