This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Reliance on adviser was reasonable excuse for late application for enhanced protection

By Mark McLaughlin, September 2021

The appellant’s continued reliance on a professional adviser was a reasonable excuse for a late application for enhanced pension protection, and his appeal against HMRC’s refusal to accept the late application was allowed. 

The appellant fully retired in 2010, although he had retired from his main role as managing director of a well-known restaurant chain in 2003. The appellant had financial advisers who assisted him with his pensions and investments. He dealt with a named individual. He received no advice about enhanced protection in 2006. The named individual changed in 2009 following illness. The appellant was still not advised about enhanced protection or the 2012 fixed protection limit of £1.8 million. Following his adviser’s recommendation, the appellant obtained the 2014 lifetime allowance of &pound

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Claim for tax credit under ESC B18 was not subject to six-year income limit
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2023
What is the ‘quality’ of residence?
By Meg Saksida, January 2023
Discovery assessment conditions were not satisfied
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2022
Determinations of PAYE and penalty assessments upheld following unannounced HMRC visit
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2020
Taxpayers’ behaviour was not fraudulent/deliberate but was negligent/careless
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020