This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Tribunals erred in their approach to the ‘significant influence’ test in the salaried members rules

By Mark McLaughlin, March 2025

The Court of Appeal held that the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal both erred in law in accepting a wide construction of Condition B of the ‘salaried members’ rules for limited liability partnerships and remitted the case to the FTT to reconsider the evidence in the light of the correct test.  

Summary 

The Court of Appeal held that the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) and Upper Tribunal (UT) erred in law in accepting a wide construction of Condition B of the ‘salaried members’ rules for limited liability partnerships (LLPs) and remitted the case to the FTT to reconsider the evidence in the light of the correct test. 

Background 

The respondent (and cross-respondent) LLP provided investment management services to the group’s funds and back-office services to other group entities. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issued PAYE determinations and a decision

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

One of the taxpayer company’s grounds for appealing a First-tier Tribunal decision in an IR35 case was refused
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026
Share issue was subject to disqualifying arrangements
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2025
‘Presumption of continuity’ applied to under-declarations of income
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2021
Taxpayer did not deliberately withhold information in failing to file tax returns
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021
Mistaken belief about requirement to submit CIS returns was not a reasonably held belief
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2020