This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayer’s telephone call was insufficient notification of liability

By Mark McLaughlin, April 2026

A telephone call by the taxpayer to the child benefit office was insufficient notification of liability to the high-income child benefit charge, and the appellant’s appeals against discovery assessments in respect of the high-income child benefit charge and penalties were dismissed. 

The appellant was an employee who had never been required to submit a tax return. She began claiming child benefit from 17 August 2015. On 15 February 2018, the appellant telephoned the child benefit office (CBO), stating she wanted to inform them about a change of circumstances as her income was now above £50,000. She believed that, as a result, she was no longer entitled to child benefit. The appellant informed the ‘advisor’ that her income was now £54,000. The advisor indicated that about 40% of the child benefit payments would be paid in tax and the appellant

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Employer’s PILON payment to employee was taxable as payment motive was separate from employee’s disability
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026
Claims were incorrectly based on increased salaries
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2025
Agents were acting on the taxpayer’s behalf despite submitting tax returns without the taxpayer approving them
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2025
Payments on termination were not exempt as compensation for loss of office
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2025
LLPs entitled to EZAs based on apportionment to determine expenditure on the relevant interests in buildings
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2021