This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

The ‘business in question’ was carried on by a related party before 1 April 2002

By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020

On a transfer of the assets of two dentistry businesses to a company, the ‘business in question’ was a business carried on by a related party before 1 April 2002, and the relevant discovery assessment was validly made and was not ‘stale’. 

Summary 

On a transfer of the assets of two dentistry businesses to a company, the ‘business in question’ was a business carried on by a related party before 1 April 2002, and the relevant discovery assessment was validly made and was not ‘stale’. 

Background 

The appellant company acquired the assets of two dentistry businesses on 1 December 2010 and began trading as a dental practice on that date. The preceding businesses had been carried on separately since 1996 by two self-employed dentists who operated from the same site and shared certain overhead costs.

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Group debt restructuring involved a tax advantage and a tax avoidance purpose
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023
Computer and clerical error were not reasonable excuses for the late filing of a corporation tax return
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2022
Information about professional advice was not reasonably required by HMRC to determine if penalties were due
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2021
Share exchange was not subject to anti-avoidance provisions
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2021
Company directors were liable for tax not paid by company
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020