This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Trades of companies had not begun to be carried on by the statutory deadline

By Mark McLaughlin, May 2026

The Upper Tribunal dismissed the appeals of the appellant companies for different reasons from the First-tier Tribunal and concluded that both companies were still preparing to trade on the deadline for needing to have begun to carry on a qualifying trade.

Individual investors sought income tax relief under the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS). One of the statutory conditions for EIS relief purposes was that the money raised by the appellants from the issue of shares was employed wholly for the purposes of a ‘qualifying business activity’. The appellants considered that they satisfied the condition by ‘preparing to carry on’ a qualifying trade. However, this could be a qualifying business activity only if the qualifying trade itself was ‘begun to be carried on’ by a particular deadline, which in this case was 4 April 2018. A dispute arose with HM Revenue and Customs on this point. On appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT),

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Permission given for individual who was not the nominated partner in a partnership to make late appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026
Taxpayers awarded costs against HMRC of £1
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2022
Lack of knowledge or advice was no reasonable excuse for late claim for lifetime allowance charge protection
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2021
Withdrawal of gross payment status eight years after compliance failures was disproportionate
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2021
Construction industry scheme: Special purpose property development company payments were subject to the CIS
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2020