This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was a pharmacist liable to register for VAT and were they entitled to exemption from registration?

By Andrew Needham, July 2019

Summary 
 
The appellant carried on the business of a pharmacy and dispensed prescriptions including private prescriptions. This appeal concerned whether the appellant was entitled to zero rate certain of the supplies it made of prescription medicines which were dispensed on private prescriptions.  

Background 

HMRC assessed the appellant to VAT and interest in the sum of £156,782.41 by a notice dated 15 April 2016.  

In 2007 the appellant entered into a contractual relationship with Hexpress Limited (Hexpress), a Guernsey company and a Mauritian company called Gloxinia which continued until 2013. Hexpress and Gloxinia contracted with a UK company, E-med Private Medical Services Limited (E-med) to carry out the medical screening services. E-med employed the doctors

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Should the appellant have registered for VAT in January 2013 or were they always under the registration limit?
By Andrew Needham, July 2020
Was the appellant liable to register for VAT and was he entitled to exemption from registration?
By Andrew Needham, June 2019
Were HMRC Reasonable To Refuse To Backdate An Incorrect EDR?
By Andrew Needham, April 2019
Was The Appellant In Businesses Or Intending To Run A Business?
By Andrew Needham, May 2017
Was There Any Evidence Of An Intention To Trade And Were HMRC Correct To Cancel The Appellant VAT Registration?
By Andrew Needham, June 2015