This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was The Appellant In Businesses Or Intending To Run A Business?

By Andrew Needham, May 2017
This was an appeal against HMRC’s decision to cancel the Appellants VAT registration and disallow all input tax claimed on the grounds that the Appellant was not and had not intended to be in business. The Appellant registered for VAT on the basis that it intended to make taxable supplies.
 
The Appellant had two directors and a separate corporate investor (Icealarm) owning 60% of the shareholding. Icealarm had invested for commercial gain and would not have invested in an entity that had no intention of trading profitably. It was the Appellants intention to run a music studio and they purchased premises with the intention of converting them into a commercial music studio.

The construction of the studio took much longer than expected and the two potential clients identified by the Appellant dropped out of the project. Although efforts were made to secure other clients none were identified as the recording industry was
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Should the appellant have registered for VAT in January 2013 or were they always under the registration limit?
By Andrew Needham, July 2020
Was the appellant liable to register for VAT and was he entitled to exemption from registration?
By Andrew Needham, August 2019
Was a pharmacist liable to register for VAT and were they entitled to exemption from registration?
By Andrew Needham, July 2019
Was the appellant liable to register for VAT and was he entitled to exemption from registration?
By Andrew Needham, June 2019
Was the appellant an employee?
By Andrew Needham, June 2019