This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the appellant liable to register for VAT and was he entitled to exemption from registration?

By Andrew Needham, August 2019

Summary

This was an appeal in respect of a decision of HMRC disallowing bad debt relief against the appellant’s VAT account. 

Background

The facts of the case were common ground. They were:

  • the appellant made sales to people who sought to purchase goods or services over the telephone and make payment by credit or debit card
  • in the VAT quarter ending 31 July 2016, the appellant claimed bad debt relief in respect of goods/services purchased by customers who had supposedly made payment by credit or debit card over the telephone
  • it was also common ground that the appellant had a dishonest employee who had arranged matters so that when a customer made a payment over the telephone, by
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Should the appellant have registered for VAT in January 2013 or were they always under the registration limit?
By Andrew Needham, July 2020
Was a pharmacist liable to register for VAT and were they entitled to exemption from registration?
By Andrew Needham, July 2019
Were HMRC Reasonable To Refuse To Backdate An Incorrect EDR?
By Andrew Needham, April 2019
Was The Appellant In Businesses Or Intending To Run A Business?
By Andrew Needham, May 2017
Was There Any Evidence Of An Intention To Trade And Were HMRC Correct To Cancel The Appellant VAT Registration?
By Andrew Needham, June 2015