This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the appellant an employee?

By Andrew Needham, June 2019

his was an appeal a compulsory VAT registration where the appellant argued that he was merely an employee of the off-licence, not the owner. 
The appellant appealed against the following decisions by HMRC: 

(1)          to compulsorily register the appellant for VAT under Schedule 1(1)(a) of VATA 1994 for the period 1 May 2012 to 30 June 2014; and 
(2)          to impose a penalty for the Failure to Notify (‘FTN’). 

HMRC contended that the appellant traded as an off-licence from Shandwick Square, Easterhouse. 

The appellant represented himself and his defence was that he was an employee and did not run the businesses but was the manager of the shop and produced correspondence to support this. 

HMRC considered

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Should the appellant have registered for VAT in January 2013 or were they always under the registration limit?
By Andrew Needham, July 2020
Was the appellant liable to register for VAT and was he entitled to exemption from registration?
By Andrew Needham, August 2019
Was the appellant liable to register for VAT and was he entitled to exemption from registration?
By Andrew Needham, June 2019
Were HMRC Reasonable To Refuse To Backdate An Incorrect EDR?
By Andrew Needham, April 2019
Was The Appellant In Businesses Or Intending To Run A Business?
By Andrew Needham, May 2017