This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was HMRC able to impose a security on a company without giving any reasons? 

By Andrew Needham, September 2019

This was an appeal by a company against a security requirement where HMRC gave no reasons for its imposition. 

This is an appeal against a decision of HMRC requiring the appellant to provide security in the sum of £29,450 against future VAT sums due. The requirement was made by a written notification served on 27 September 2017. That notification was a bare requirement to provide security. It gave not a single reason to explain why the respondents were making the requirement. HMRC informed the appellant that if they made taxable supplies without the security being provided, the appellant would be committing a criminal offence. 

When the appellant received the notification, it contacted HMRC to ask for the reason or reasons for the requirement to provide the required security. The respondents replied by letter dated 3 November 2017, giving its reason(s) as follows:

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was the supply of fuel with plant hire a single composite supply or a multiple supply?
By Andrew Needham, January 2025
Did the appellants make or intend to make taxable supplies?
By Andrew Needham, December 2023
Was interest payable by HMRC on overpaid output tax paid on demonstrator bonuses?
By Andrew Needham, February 2023
Was the adaptation of Merlin helicopters to use early warning radar a supply of goods or services?
By Andrew Needham, February 2022
Was the Respondent making exempt supplies of education?
By Andrew Needham, March 2021