This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the supply of accommodation exempt residential accommodation or in a ‘hotel or similar establishment’?

By Andrew Needham, February 2024

The appellant owned a property comprising 656 self-contained apartments and some commercial units. 421 of these apartments were let on long leases, as to which no issue arose. This appeal was concerned with the VAT treatment of the letting of the remaining 235 apartments.   

The appellant contended that the letting out of the apartments was an exempt supply of accommodation. Related services at all material times were separately provided by Chelsea Cloisters Services Limited (CCSL), a company under common ownership with the appellant, to the occupiers of the apartments. Those supplies have throughout been treated as taxable at the standard rate. 

HMRC contended that the use of the apartments was carved out of the exemption in Item 1 by excepted item (d), which applies to "the provision in an hotel, inn, boarding house or similar establishment of sleeping accommodation". Note 9 to Group 1, Schedule 9 of the VAT Act 1994 provides

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was the provision of an access card a zero-rated supply of an item designed solely for the use by disabled persons?
By Andrew Needham, March 2026
Was the payment of a security bond a taxable supply or a bond?
By Andrew Needham, September 2025
Was the appellant entitled to a repayment from HMRC for historical VAT on historical bad debts that it stated it had not claimed?
By Andrew Needham, May 2023
Was input tax fully recoverable when a taxpayer received subsidies?
By Andrew Needham, August 2021
Was bad debt relief available on historic bad debts?
By Andrew Needham, May 2021