This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Were the supplies made by the appellant exempt loan administration services?

By Andrew Needham, January 2020

This was an appeal from the First-tier Tribunal (FTT ) to the Upper Tribunal by the appellant against its decision that loan administration services supplied by the appellant to a UK bank, Shawbrook Bank Limited (‘Shawbrook’), were standard-rated supplies of debt collection services rather than exempt ones as claimed by the appellant. 

In brief, the appellant’s contractual arrangements with Shawbrook related to four categories of loans provided by Shawbrook to customers in the course of its lending business. The appellant’s description of its supplies was “loan account administration services”. In essence, the services that the appellant provided covered the entire lifecycle of the loans covered by the arrangements, apart from the making of the initial loan or any further advance. The appellant established loan accounts using its own systems, communicated with borrowers as an

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Were the supplies received by the appellant within the insurance exemption?
By Andrew Needham, June 2022
Should income from two similar types of gaming machine be treated in the same way or should one be exempt and the other standard rated?
By Andrew Needham, June 2020
Was a payment handling service exempt from VAT?
By Andrew Needham, April 2020
Were Supplies Made By Private Profit Making Welfare Organisations Covered By The Exemption Even Though They Were Not State Regulated?
By Andrew Needham, March 2019
Booking Fees Exempt From VAT
By Andrew Needham, June 2014