This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Sideways Loss Relief Denied As Trades Were Not Commercial

By Mark McLaughlin, March 2015
An individual was not entitled to claim trading loss relief against his general income, as the trades were not carried on on a commercial basis, and were not carried on with a view to the realisation of profits.
 
The appellant started a trade in 2004 of supplying ingredients and running cookery workshops (‘Silver Spice’). In 2007, he started a separate trade, selling art and photographic images of Indian culture (‘Art Sutra’). The appellant conducted both trades as a sole trader, alongside his full-time employment as a psychiatric social worker.

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) had to consider whether the appellant was entitled to set off losses in either trade against his employment income in the tax years 2006/07 to 2009/10 (under ICTA 1988, s 380 and ITA 2007, s 64). HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) contended that he was not entitled to the loss relief, because the trades were either not carried on on a
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Sideways relief for farming losses denied on HMRC appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2020
HMRC’s Estimates Of Barrister’s Profits Were Overstated
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2018
Sideways Loss Relief Available As Trade Was Commercial
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2018
Taxpayer Could Not Account For Invoices On Receipts Basis
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2016
Farm Trading Loss Relief Disallowed As Farming Activities Did Not Satisfy Profit Test
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2016