This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Tribunal Decision To Disallow Sideways Loss Relief Set Aside

By Mark McLaughlin, November 2016
A First-tier Tribunal decision to disallow sideways relief for trading losses was set aside, and the Upper Tribunal remitted the case for the First-tier Tribunal to consider whether an asparagus business was market gardening or farming, and to determine whether there was a single, composite trade of horse breeding and the asparagus business.

In April 2004, the appellant started to trade as a horse breeder. In 2008, she embarked on a new venture of growing asparagus for sale. The appellant claimed sideways loss relief (under TMA 1970, s 64) in respect of a trade described as ‘equestrian breeder and farming’ against declared income from employment in her tax return for 2008/09. Following an enquiry, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issued a closure notice to disallow the losses. 

The appellant’s appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) was dismissed ([2014] UKFTT 0730 (TC)). The appellant appealed, on the ground
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Condition For Change Of Accounting Date Was Not Met
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2019
Facility For Drying, Conditioning, And Storing Grain Was Plant And Machinery
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2019
Son’s Wages Were Not A Deductible Business Expense
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2018
Accommodation Costs Were Not Wholly And Exclusively Incurred By Actor
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2015
Loan Interest Relief Not Due As Borrowings Were Not Used Wholly For Trade Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2015