This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was Student Accommodation Designed As A Dwelling Or A Number Of Dwellings?

By Andrew Needham, August 2018
This was an appeal by HMRC against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that student accommodation could be zero-rated as a building designed as a dwelling or number of dwellings.

This was an appeal by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) (‘the appellant’) against a decision of the FTT that the services relating to the construction of student accommodation made by Summit Electrical Limited (‘Summit’), an electrical subcontractor, to Create Construction Ltd (‘Create’) was zero-rated.

On the basis that a zero-rating certificate had been issued by Create to its supplies and by the developer and on the basis that the buildings were, therefore, to be used for a relevant residential purpose (rather than on the basis that the accommodation created was a series of flats designed as a dwelling), the appellant refused to permit Summit to zero-rate its supplies to Create. 

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Should VAT recovery be allowed without the required evidence for input tax recovery?
By Andrew Needham, May 2026
Was the payment of a security bond a taxable supply or a bond?
By Andrew Needham, September 2025
Was the value of import VAT due based on payments made to suppliers or the value of goods actually imported?
By Andrew Needham, July 2025
Were the supplies of education supplied by the three higher educational bodies exempt from VAT?
By Andrew Needham, June 2025
Were the inaccuracies in the VAT returns deliberate and was the director of the company personally responsible for the deliberate errors?
By Andrew Needham, May 2025