This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Were the inaccuracies in the VAT returns deliberate and was the director of the company personally responsible for the deliberate errors?

By Andrew Needham, May 2025

Summary 

HMRC assessed Black Wolf Ltd for a penalty for submitting VAT returns for the VAT periods February 2019 to November 2021, which in their view contained inaccuracies which were due to the deliberate behaviour of the company. HMRC also thought that these inaccuracies were attributable to the behaviour of the appellant, a director of the company, and accordingly issued a penalty liability notice (PLN) that the appellant was liable to pay 100% of the penalty. The appellant contended that there were no deliberate inaccuracies and the VAT recovery had been correct. 

Background 

The appellant ran a locksmith business but due to ill health, the business ran down and he decided to cease trading and de-register for VAT. Shortly before this, HMRC commenced a compliance check on the business which was carried out by email and there were never any face-to-face meetings. During his period of ill health, his

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Supply for consideration: was grant-funded income for the provision of education a supply of services for consideration?
By Andrew Needham, February 2025
Did the input tax claimed by the appellant have a direct and immediate link to the making of taxable supplies?
By Andrew Needham, November 2024
Was the appellant entitled to a repayment from HMRC for historical VAT on historical bad debts that it stated it had not claimed?
By Andrew Needham, May 2023
Assessment for underdeclared output tax:  Was the business trading and was the assessment to best judgement?
By Andrew Needham, August 2020
Bad debt relief: Was the appellant entitled to adjust its daily gross takings figure more than four years after the debt became due?
By Andrew Needham, February 2020