This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Assessment for underdeclared output tax:  Was the business trading and was the assessment to best judgement?

By Andrew Needham, August 2020

The appellant was originally assessed to VAT for periods 9/13 to 3/16 totalling £102,168. This was reduced on review to VAT for periods 3/15 to 3/16 totalling £46,440. The reduction was on the basis that the amounts assessed for the periods 9/13 to 12/14 were out of time, and were therefore cancelled. 

Background 

The appellant was a sole trader who was engaged in the supply of vehicle repairs and haulier services. It is a matter of dispute when he ceased to trade. 

There was a joint enquiry into both income tax and VAT liabilities of the appellant. For the periods 12/13 to 9/16, the appellant had filed “nil” returns. 

Several attempts had been made between September 2013 and June 2014 by various HMRC officers to arrange a meeting with the appellant, but all appointments made to meet him were cancelled. On 9 July 2015, HMRC wrote to the&nbsp

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was the supply of fuel with plant hire a single composite supply or a multiple supply?
By Andrew Needham, January 2025
Did the construction of a standalone extension qualify as the construction of a new residential property?
By Andrew Needham, April 2023
Was the Respondent making exempt supplies of education?
By Andrew Needham, March 2021
Were Sales Made In France Or Diverted To The UK And Subject To UK VAT?
By Andrew Needham, January 2019
Were HMRC Unreasonable To Refuse A Belated Notification?
By Andrew Needham, October 2018